ajaysri
08-07 01:31 PM
Any idea guys? any one had this experience?
wallpaper Blonde Spiral Curly Prom
rockyrock
07-28 11:41 AM
I have got 2 I-140 (one pending and approved) both from different lawyers.....I applied 485 with my approved I-140 with this lawyer, but am not sure if he has applied or not as he had given wrong info few times before...... he claims he has applied.........my question is - Can I go ahead and apply another 485 with the pending I-140 frm another lawyer to be on the same side? I plan to withdraw one once I receive both receipts.....Any risks?
Blog Feeds
12-05 09:20 PM
conservative columnist and former Bush speechwriter David Frum would like to see three more concessions on the DREAM Act to get conservatives to agree to the bill - http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/12/middle-ground-on-dream.html: Here would be my three main suggestions: 1) Lower the age of entry into the US. Even the new versions of the law extend amnesty to people who entered the US up to age 16. That allows too many people who entered on their own impetus rather than as part of a family group � and too many people whose first language will never be English. I�d lower to 12, to...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/12/david-frum-water-down-dream-a-little-more-.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/12/david-frum-water-down-dream-a-little-more-.html)
2011 Blonde Spiral Curly Prom
enggr
11-19 01:46 PM
PERM processing date released (as of 10/31/2010).
# Analyst Reviews: September 2010
# Audits: October 2008
My spouse's priority date is late nov 2008 and we are still waiting. Has anyone seen any approvals of audited PERM filed in nov 2008. Please share your experience.
i assume DOL is processing nov as of this month.
Any analysis/predictions?
# Analyst Reviews: September 2010
# Audits: October 2008
My spouse's priority date is late nov 2008 and we are still waiting. Has anyone seen any approvals of audited PERM filed in nov 2008. Please share your experience.
i assume DOL is processing nov as of this month.
Any analysis/predictions?
more...
boldm28
06-13 10:41 AM
When to expect EAD /AP if I had filed my EAD/485/ on June 10
PD being current
I know it takes 3 months but with this kinda mass filing I want to know the date to make some decisions
thanks
Bol
PD being current
I know it takes 3 months but with this kinda mass filing I want to know the date to make some decisions
thanks
Bol
helcrase
11-16 05:10 PM
Hi All,
I have applied for H1b to F1 visa transfer with an i-20 from a university for the Spring of 2010.
Now, I received an admission from a better university for the same term (Spirng 2010) and I wish to join the Second University.
Could you please tell me the procedure to join second university.
1. Can I let the H1-F1 visa transfe (first university) go through and then apply for change of university or something ? If so, can some one outline the procedure for transfer of university (I am worried about the time it takes for the transfer of university for me to join for Spring 2010).
2. Is it possible to change the transfer application with i-20 and appropriate financial documentation ?
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
hel
I have applied for H1b to F1 visa transfer with an i-20 from a university for the Spring of 2010.
Now, I received an admission from a better university for the same term (Spirng 2010) and I wish to join the Second University.
Could you please tell me the procedure to join second university.
1. Can I let the H1-F1 visa transfe (first university) go through and then apply for change of university or something ? If so, can some one outline the procedure for transfer of university (I am worried about the time it takes for the transfer of university for me to join for Spring 2010).
2. Is it possible to change the transfer application with i-20 and appropriate financial documentation ?
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
hel
more...
nagarimohan
10-29 11:06 AM
My Situation:
I am on H1B visa and working now with employer �A� (from Jun 10 to Till Date)
I was working with employer �B� (from Jun 09 to Jun 10)
I was previously also working with employer �A� (which is now my present employer) from Jul 08 to Mar 09,
My H1 Transfer from employer �B� to �A� has been filed in last Jun 10 but it is in Process now.
Now my present project is over, I have got a project with employer �C�
My Questions:
1. Can I join the employer �C� by filing another H1 transfer? as of now still my H1 Transfer (employer �B� to employer �A�) is in process.
2. I have also got another project with my ex employer �B�, I can see the I797 petition of the employer �B� is still showing a status of approved in the USCIS state, it has not been reoked. Can I rejoin the ex employer �B� without filing any new H1 Transfer ( from employer �A� to employer �B�).
Will appreciate your answer,
Thanks,
Nagari
I am on H1B visa and working now with employer �A� (from Jun 10 to Till Date)
I was working with employer �B� (from Jun 09 to Jun 10)
I was previously also working with employer �A� (which is now my present employer) from Jul 08 to Mar 09,
My H1 Transfer from employer �B� to �A� has been filed in last Jun 10 but it is in Process now.
Now my present project is over, I have got a project with employer �C�
My Questions:
1. Can I join the employer �C� by filing another H1 transfer? as of now still my H1 Transfer (employer �B� to employer �A�) is in process.
2. I have also got another project with my ex employer �B�, I can see the I797 petition of the employer �B� is still showing a status of approved in the USCIS state, it has not been reoked. Can I rejoin the ex employer �B� without filing any new H1 Transfer ( from employer �A� to employer �B�).
Will appreciate your answer,
Thanks,
Nagari
2010 Curly hairstyles
Flo
01-08 09:23 AM
I've had my I-140, I-485 pending since August 2007 in Nebraska and i just started getting worried recently when i found out that the job title in the I-140 does not match the job name in my labor cert.
My labor cert took 4 years to be approved and in the meantime my job changed. It is still in the same field/department, in the same company, but it just evolved but still requires the same skills as the labor cert.
I was originally on H-1B and now i work with my EAD. My H1B was amended when my job changed but not the labor cert since we were well into the process when all this happened.
This is really the only concern that i have regarding the approval of my I-140 and I-485. Do any of you know if the job name difference would be a problem for the I-140 to be approved? At the least i hope they would send me an RFE and not deny it right away.
Thanks for any advice you could give me!
:o)
My labor cert took 4 years to be approved and in the meantime my job changed. It is still in the same field/department, in the same company, but it just evolved but still requires the same skills as the labor cert.
I was originally on H-1B and now i work with my EAD. My H1B was amended when my job changed but not the labor cert since we were well into the process when all this happened.
This is really the only concern that i have regarding the approval of my I-140 and I-485. Do any of you know if the job name difference would be a problem for the I-140 to be approved? At the least i hope they would send me an RFE and not deny it right away.
Thanks for any advice you could give me!
:o)
more...
suchiram
12-19 10:53 PM
I have been on q job with a client since October. The setup is like this. Me->my employer->Vendor-.Client.
The work order my employer has states that my work with the client ends June end, with a possibility of extension. if i file my h1b now, will i be a good candidate for rejection , considering that I do not have a long term project? Also, how true is it that the USCIS is giving visas out only for 1 year under such circumstances, as opposed to the regular 3 years term, and if true, how do I avoid it
Lastly, what is your take on how H1 filings on Apr 1 2010 will be? Is it expected to the same as last year, or will companies file left right and center on day 1 itself?
The work order my employer has states that my work with the client ends June end, with a possibility of extension. if i file my h1b now, will i be a good candidate for rejection , considering that I do not have a long term project? Also, how true is it that the USCIS is giving visas out only for 1 year under such circumstances, as opposed to the regular 3 years term, and if true, how do I avoid it
Lastly, what is your take on how H1 filings on Apr 1 2010 will be? Is it expected to the same as last year, or will companies file left right and center on day 1 itself?
hair Hairsytles Tips: Spiral Curls
solaris27
04-28 09:59 AM
Hi
My friend was on H1B visa from last 5.5 years and Laid off last week .
I want to know what options she has to stay in USA.
from last company her labor and 140 was approved .
Can she do visa transfer and start new labor ?
Its only 5-6 months left in her 6 year h1b visa .
Attorneys please reply .
My friend was on H1B visa from last 5.5 years and Laid off last week .
I want to know what options she has to stay in USA.
from last company her labor and 140 was approved .
Can she do visa transfer and start new labor ?
Its only 5-6 months left in her 6 year h1b visa .
Attorneys please reply .
more...
vaishnavilakshmi
06-21 05:15 PM
Hi,
Since iam nursing my son,mmr vaccination was not given to me.i saw my report and compared.In the contraindication colomn ,he checked for MMR vaccination.This means for some reasons(or if under medication) i was not given this vaccination?Did anyone experience this?will i b asked to take it ?
vaishu
Since iam nursing my son,mmr vaccination was not given to me.i saw my report and compared.In the contraindication colomn ,he checked for MMR vaccination.This means for some reasons(or if under medication) i was not given this vaccination?Did anyone experience this?will i b asked to take it ?
vaishu
hot spiral curl hairstyles
gauravsh
05-12 11:16 AM
Thanks. Its worth reading,
more...
house house loose-spiral-curls loose
Macaca
10-28 09:52 AM
It's time we seriously ponder fixing the Constitution (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/10/28/INCHSUV9I.DTL&hw=immigration&sn=008&sc=247) By Larry J. Sabato | San Francisco Chronicle, October 28, 2007
Professor Larry J. Sabato is the author of "A More Perfect Constitution: 23 Proposals to Revitalize Our Constitution and Make America a Fairer Country" (Walker & Company, 2007). He is the founder and director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia. Contact us at insight@sfchronicle.com.
What is the undisturbed and unaddressed source of many of the nation's current difficulties? It's the Constitution of the United States.
The Constitution has become a secularly sacred document, as though God handed it to Moses in a third tablet on the Mount. The 2008 presidential candidates have been offering us prescriptions for everything from Iraq to health care over the past several months. But here is the problem: Their fixes are situational and incremental. In the meantime, underlying structural problems with America's governmental and political system are preventing us from solving our most intractable challenges.
If progress as a society is to be made, it is time for elemental change. The last place we look to understand why the U.S. system isn't working well anymore - the Constitution - should be the first place. A careful look at constitutional reform should begin now and culminate in a new Constitutional Convention.
Does this sound radical? If so, then the framers were radicals, too. They would be both disappointed and amazed that after 220 years, the inheritors of their Constitution had not tried to adapt to new developments they could never have anticipated in Philadelphia in 1787. Urging his future countrymen to take advantage of their own experiences with government, George Washington declared, "I do not think we are more inspired, have more wisdom, or possess more virtue, than those who will come after us."
Thomas Jefferson insisted that "No society can make a perpetual Constitution. ... The earth belongs always to the living generation. ... Every Constitution ... naturally expires at the end of 19 years," the length of a generation in Jefferson's time.
The overall design of the Constitution remains brilliant and sound with respect to the Bill of Rights and the separation of powers. But there are numerous archaic provisions that inhibit constructive change and adaptation to a 21st century world unimaginable to the framers.
Let's explore a few: More than 14 million U.S. citizens are automatically and irrevocably barred from holding the office of president simply because they were not born in the United States - either they are immigrants or their U.S. mothers gave birth to them while outside U.S. territory. This exclusion creates a noxious form of second-class citizenship. The requirement that the president must be a "natural born citizen" should be replaced with a condition that a candidate must be a U.S. citizen for at least 20 years before election to the presidency.
Both the Vietnam and Iraq conflicts have illustrated a modern imbalance in the constitutional power to wage war. Once Congress consented to these wars, presidents were able to continue them for many years long after popular support had drastically declined. Limit the president's war-making authority by creating a provision that requires Congress to vote affirmatively every six months to continue U.S. military involvement. Debate in both houses would be limited so that the vote could not be delayed. If either house of Congress voted to end a war, the president would have one year to withdraw all combat troops.
If the 26 least populated states voted as a bloc, they would control the U.S. Senate with a total of just under 17 percent of the country's population. This small-state stranglehold is not merely a bump in the road; it is a massive roadblock to fairness that can, and often does, stop all progressive traffic. We should give each of the 10 most populated states two additional Senate seats and give each of the next 15 most populated states one additional seat. Sparsely populated states will still be disproportionately represented, but the ridiculous tilt to them in today's system can be a thing of the past.
If someone purposefully tried to conjure up the most random and illogical method of nominating presidential candidates, the resulting system would probably look much as ours does today. The incoherent lineup of primaries and caucuses forces candidates to campaign at least a year before the first nomination contest so they can become known nationwide and raise the money needed to compete. Congress should be constitutionally required to designate four regions of contiguous states; the regions would hold their nominating events in successive months, beginning in April and ending in July. A U.S. Election Lottery, to be held on Jan. 1 of the presidential election year, would determine the order of regional events. The new system would add an element of drama to the beginning of a presidential year while also shortening the campaign: No one would know in which region the contest would begin until New Year's Day.
Excessive authority has accrued to the federal courts, especially the Supreme Court - so much so that had the framers realized the courts' eventual powers, they would have limited judicial authority. The insularity of lifetime tenure, combined with the appointments of relatively young attorneys who give long service on the bench, produces senior judges representing the views of past generations better than views of the current day. A nonrenewable term limit of 15 years should apply to all federal judges, from the district courts all the way up to the Supreme Court.
This all is just a mere scratch on the surface in identifying long-overdue constitutional reforms. There are dozens of other worthy proposals than can and ought to be discussed, if we but have the will to imagine a better Constitution. No rational person will rush to change the Constitution, and it will take many years of thorough-going work. But let's at least start the discussion, and begin thinking about the generation-long process that could lead to a new constitutional convention sometime this century.
Professor Larry J. Sabato is the author of "A More Perfect Constitution: 23 Proposals to Revitalize Our Constitution and Make America a Fairer Country" (Walker & Company, 2007). He is the founder and director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia. Contact us at insight@sfchronicle.com.
What is the undisturbed and unaddressed source of many of the nation's current difficulties? It's the Constitution of the United States.
The Constitution has become a secularly sacred document, as though God handed it to Moses in a third tablet on the Mount. The 2008 presidential candidates have been offering us prescriptions for everything from Iraq to health care over the past several months. But here is the problem: Their fixes are situational and incremental. In the meantime, underlying structural problems with America's governmental and political system are preventing us from solving our most intractable challenges.
If progress as a society is to be made, it is time for elemental change. The last place we look to understand why the U.S. system isn't working well anymore - the Constitution - should be the first place. A careful look at constitutional reform should begin now and culminate in a new Constitutional Convention.
Does this sound radical? If so, then the framers were radicals, too. They would be both disappointed and amazed that after 220 years, the inheritors of their Constitution had not tried to adapt to new developments they could never have anticipated in Philadelphia in 1787. Urging his future countrymen to take advantage of their own experiences with government, George Washington declared, "I do not think we are more inspired, have more wisdom, or possess more virtue, than those who will come after us."
Thomas Jefferson insisted that "No society can make a perpetual Constitution. ... The earth belongs always to the living generation. ... Every Constitution ... naturally expires at the end of 19 years," the length of a generation in Jefferson's time.
The overall design of the Constitution remains brilliant and sound with respect to the Bill of Rights and the separation of powers. But there are numerous archaic provisions that inhibit constructive change and adaptation to a 21st century world unimaginable to the framers.
Let's explore a few: More than 14 million U.S. citizens are automatically and irrevocably barred from holding the office of president simply because they were not born in the United States - either they are immigrants or their U.S. mothers gave birth to them while outside U.S. territory. This exclusion creates a noxious form of second-class citizenship. The requirement that the president must be a "natural born citizen" should be replaced with a condition that a candidate must be a U.S. citizen for at least 20 years before election to the presidency.
Both the Vietnam and Iraq conflicts have illustrated a modern imbalance in the constitutional power to wage war. Once Congress consented to these wars, presidents were able to continue them for many years long after popular support had drastically declined. Limit the president's war-making authority by creating a provision that requires Congress to vote affirmatively every six months to continue U.S. military involvement. Debate in both houses would be limited so that the vote could not be delayed. If either house of Congress voted to end a war, the president would have one year to withdraw all combat troops.
If the 26 least populated states voted as a bloc, they would control the U.S. Senate with a total of just under 17 percent of the country's population. This small-state stranglehold is not merely a bump in the road; it is a massive roadblock to fairness that can, and often does, stop all progressive traffic. We should give each of the 10 most populated states two additional Senate seats and give each of the next 15 most populated states one additional seat. Sparsely populated states will still be disproportionately represented, but the ridiculous tilt to them in today's system can be a thing of the past.
If someone purposefully tried to conjure up the most random and illogical method of nominating presidential candidates, the resulting system would probably look much as ours does today. The incoherent lineup of primaries and caucuses forces candidates to campaign at least a year before the first nomination contest so they can become known nationwide and raise the money needed to compete. Congress should be constitutionally required to designate four regions of contiguous states; the regions would hold their nominating events in successive months, beginning in April and ending in July. A U.S. Election Lottery, to be held on Jan. 1 of the presidential election year, would determine the order of regional events. The new system would add an element of drama to the beginning of a presidential year while also shortening the campaign: No one would know in which region the contest would begin until New Year's Day.
Excessive authority has accrued to the federal courts, especially the Supreme Court - so much so that had the framers realized the courts' eventual powers, they would have limited judicial authority. The insularity of lifetime tenure, combined with the appointments of relatively young attorneys who give long service on the bench, produces senior judges representing the views of past generations better than views of the current day. A nonrenewable term limit of 15 years should apply to all federal judges, from the district courts all the way up to the Supreme Court.
This all is just a mere scratch on the surface in identifying long-overdue constitutional reforms. There are dozens of other worthy proposals than can and ought to be discussed, if we but have the will to imagine a better Constitution. No rational person will rush to change the Constitution, and it will take many years of thorough-going work. But let's at least start the discussion, and begin thinking about the generation-long process that could lead to a new constitutional convention sometime this century.
tattoo Smith | Spiral curls below
Preetihere
06-10 06:00 PM
Hi,
Please advice on my situation.
1)I was on L1 and applied for change of status from L1 to h4.once this was approved(I just saw the approval had not recieved any docs) i had to traval to India becos of my health.
2)while in India i gt 2 know that my H1 gt approved in may end (I797 A with new I-94).
as planned i came back with h4 stamped.
does this effect my h1 which valid from 1 oct 2010 in any way as I am currenly on h4 and plz advice what needs to be done to work from 1 oct
.please help.
Thanks
Please advice on my situation.
1)I was on L1 and applied for change of status from L1 to h4.once this was approved(I just saw the approval had not recieved any docs) i had to traval to India becos of my health.
2)while in India i gt 2 know that my H1 gt approved in may end (I797 A with new I-94).
as planned i came back with h4 stamped.
does this effect my h1 which valid from 1 oct 2010 in any way as I am currenly on h4 and plz advice what needs to be done to work from 1 oct
.please help.
Thanks
more...
pictures Hairstyle Secrets
gchopes
10-02 10:51 AM
Starting a new thread to track receipts / check cashed for packages received and signed by M SALCEDO at TSC.
My info:
Pkg signed by M SALCEDO at TSC on 7/27
No CC or RNs.
EB3 India.
Please let me know if you are in a similar boat.
gchopes
My info:
Pkg signed by M SALCEDO at TSC on 7/27
No CC or RNs.
EB3 India.
Please let me know if you are in a similar boat.
gchopes
dresses Vanessa Hudgens Hairstyle
miguy
07-19 08:06 AM
If I file my I-485 through my lawyer, will I have to be with him for all subsequent EAD/AP renewals as well or can I renew them on my own?
Do lawyers charge extra for EAD/AP renwals?
Do lawyers charge extra for EAD/AP renwals?
more...
makeup Curly Bob Hair Styles - How to
freddyCR
January 6th, 2005, 08:13 AM
I shot this pic in the backside of the medieval Torres de Serranos in Valencia. I quite like the symmetry. What do you think?
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/2555doors-1_Medium_.jpg
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/2555doors-1_Medium_.jpg
girlfriend hairstyles, celeb hairstyles, queen latifah, tight spiral curls queen
Blog Feeds
02-05 06:40 PM
With the advent of the new (FY 2011) H-1B filing season quickly approaching (April 1), it is not too early to begin considering an issue that was first thrust upon the H-1B program prior to the start of last year�s filings � the Stimulus Bill signed into law last February 17 which made it more complicated for the big banks and insurance companies that received Troubled Asset Recovery Program ("TARP") funds to hire new foreign workers on H-1B visas. Specifically, Section 1611(b) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 provides that TARP recipients may not hire new H-1B...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2010/01/is-it-time-for-h1b-protectionist-restrictions-applicable-to-tarp-recipients-to-come-to-an-end.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2010/01/is-it-time-for-h1b-protectionist-restrictions-applicable-to-tarp-recipients-to-come-to-an-end.html)
hairstyles Spiral Curls and Waves
bigariyawatgul
08-22 06:47 AM
hi kirupa, back to use your service again :-)
I'd like to know what command to use for a button that when click, it automatically download the zip.file to the user's computer.
thanks for your help :-)
I'd like to know what command to use for a button that when click, it automatically download the zip.file to the user's computer.
thanks for your help :-)
Saralayar
07-27 09:41 AM
Hi,
I got a RFE while doing my H1B transfer under premium processing. They have stated to respond within 60 days. Does anybody have an idea as to whether it takes so long or it gets resolved soon under premium processing? Please help.
Once they recieve the response, if they are satisfied, the same day they will approve. It will not take that long depending on the type of RFE.
I got a RFE while doing my H1B transfer under premium processing. They have stated to respond within 60 days. Does anybody have an idea as to whether it takes so long or it gets resolved soon under premium processing? Please help.
Once they recieve the response, if they are satisfied, the same day they will approve. It will not take that long depending on the type of RFE.
black_logs
01-29 10:11 PM
Guys there'll be a Meet the Lawmakers conference call for people from these 4 states on Wednesday(02/01/2005). Please send me an email at the following id. I'll send you the conference details and the agenda
black_logs@yahoo.com
black_logs@yahoo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment